kashmirihindu

Posts Tagged ‘canada’

17-year-old flogged Swat girl is not Taliban’s only victim in recent past

In kashmir on April 4, 2009 at 10:53

17-year-old flogged Swat girl is not Taliban’s only victim in recent past–>

Sat, Apr 4 03:05 PM

Peshawar, Apr. 4 (ANI): The videotaped footage showing a teenaged girl being whipped by the Taliban wasn’t the only barbaric instance of this sort by the radicals in the recent past.

Last year, the Swat Taliban awarded punishment of public flogging to about 25 men and 50 women, after the Pakistan Government authorized the militant group to hold courts and deliver justice.

In an incident that took place in October last year, a woman and her father-in-law were flogged in Ser-Taligram village near Manglawar for allegedly having illicit relations.

The woman had been divorced by her husband, but her father-in-law kept her in his house.

On Friday, various TV channels aired footage of 17-year-old girl’s whipping by Talibani militants, which was reportedly filmed by someone with a mobile phone.

“To be honest, we didn’t want to send it to our TV channels for use due to fear of Taliban and also on account of concern that this would bring a bad name to Swat and endanger the peace accord,” The News quoted a local TV channel reporter, as saying.

The girl belonged to Kala Killay village in Kabal tehsil, who was accused of having a relationship with an electrician.

The Taliban spokesman in Swat, Muslim Khan, apparently mixed up the two incidents of public lashing of women in Swat on Taliban orders, by saying that the girl videotaped during her canning was convicted of having illicit relations with her father-in-law.

But the fact that remains unchanged is that Taliban courts punished the two women.

Among the other cases, Taliban publicly whipped two butchers in Ningolay village for selling meat of dead animals. They also awarded lashes to two men in the same village for committing unnatural sexual offences.

Two Taliban fighters were also publicly whipped 40 times each in Bar Thana village in Matta tehsil after being found guilty by a Shariah court for extorting 360,000 rupees from a goldsmith hailing from Chupriyal village. (ANI)

ANI

‘US will not get involved in Kashmir issue’

In kashmir on April 4, 2009 at 10:48

‘US will not get involved in Kashmir issue’

Washington, (IANS) The United States has made it clear that it would steer clear of the Kashmir issue as it seeks to involve India and other key stakeholders in the region in its new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

‘We don’t intend to get involved in that issue,’ President Barack Obama’s National Security Adviser, Gen James Jones, told reporters Friday when asked if the US expected to address issues between India and Pakistan, particularly Kashmir, as part of its new regional approach.

‘But we do intend to help both countries build more trust and confidence so that Pakistan can address the issues that it confronts on the western side of the nation,’ he said referring to Pakistan’s tribal areas which Obama and other US officials have described as terrorist safe havens.

‘But no, Kashmir is a separate issue,’ Jones said. ‘But we think that the times are so serious that we need to build the trust and confidence in the region, so that nations can do what they need to do in order to defeat the threat’ posed by Al Qaeda and Taliban terrorist groups.

‘As America does more, we will ask others to join us in doing their part,’ he said referring to Obama Administration’s plans to ‘forge a new contact group for Afghanistan and Pakistan that brings together all who should have a stake in the security of the region.’

The proposed group will include America’s NATO allies and other partners, the Central Asian states, Gulf nations, Iran, Russia, India, and China, Jones said noting, ‘All have a stake in the promise of lasting peace and security and development in the region.’

Arun Kumar

The Pandits: Dole and despair

In kashmir on November 2, 2008 at 07:52

The Pandits: Dole and despair

Kashmiri Pandits — who were hounded out of their ancestral land by jihadis as part of the Islamist agenda of creating a ‘Muslim only’ Kashmir valley, as the first step towards setting up ‘Nizam-e-Mustafa’ — have been living on dole and hope for the last 18 years.
The first exodus saw 350,000 Kashmiri Pandits leaving their homes in Kashmir valley for sanctuary in Jammu and Delhi.

Subsequent targeted killing of Pandits forced the remaining to also flee and take refuge in shanty camps; those who could afford it, moved into rented accommodation. The final number of Pandits reduced to living as refugees in their own country would be as high as 400,000.

When Kashmiri Pandits fled Islamic terror

According to official statistics, notorious for being inaccurate if they are provided by the apology of a state government in Jammu & Kashmir and unreliable if they emanate from the Union home ministry, some 350,000 Kashmiri Pandits continue to camp in Jammu; another 100,000 are in Delhi. A large number of families have moved to other cities, some have migrated to the US or European countries.

Those who live in refugee camps — some 4,600 families — have to make do with one-room tenements. So, we have thousands of families who for 15 years have been condemned to live in 10 by 12 feet rooms, one room for each family. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh [Images], following his visit to a camp last year, has sanctioned funds for two-room tenements.

The pawns without a vote

Then there are those Pandit families that do not have the wherewithal to live in rented accommodation, having left behind all their assets in the ‘Muslim only’ Kashmir valley, and have not been able to secure a one-room tenement. They live in tattered tents.

Every time the issue of the plight of the Kashmiri Pandits has been raised, the Union and state governments have been quick to point out the ‘assistance’ provided to the ‘migrants.’

The assistance is all of Rs 600 per head up to a maximum of Rs 2,400 per family. And inedible, PDS surplus food grains, what the Union home ministry’s annual report eloquently describes as ‘dry ration @ 9 kgs of rice and 2 kgs of atta per person and one kg of sugar per family per month to needy migrants.’

This did not happen in my Kashmir

The ‘non-needy migrants’ are Kashmiri Pandits who were government employees. They continue to receive their salaries or pensions. But they have been deprived of benefits like promotion. Most of them are barely able to keep body and soul together.

Kashmiri Pandit children have suffered the most. According to state government officials, ’10 primary schools and three high schools have been built for migrant children.’ Who is to tell them that 10 primary schools and three high schools cannot meet the needs of 250,000 people?

Will the Pandits ever find a home?

As for health care, the Kashmiri Pandits have been left to fend for themselves. Officials claim there are 28 doctors in the camps. Show us the doctors, say the Pandits. Local residents of Jammu are entitled to free medicines and health care in government dispensaries and hospitals, but not the ‘migrants’ who must pay.

Meanwhile, depression and other stress-related health problems plague the exiled community. Studies have shown that Kashmiri Pandits have begun to age rapidly, much earlier than before. Fertility rate among them has registered a sharp decline while mortality rate has increased.

Who cares for the Pandits?

The humiliation of living on dole apart, there is this added slight of being labelled ‘migrants’ — as if the Kashmiri Pandits migrated of their own volition from the land of their forefathers. Implicit in this labelling is the shameful failure of India’s political class and its self-serving bureaucracy to recognise the truth behind the violence in Jammu & Kashmir.

Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil has the gumption to tell Parliament ‘they (terrorists in Jammu & Kashmir) are our brothers and sisters.’ Therefore, the Government of India must embrace them.

What, then, are the Kashmiri Pandits chased out of their home and hearth by Mr Patil’s ‘brothers and sisters’?

The current dispensation in Delhi, however, is only echoing the callous indifference towards the plight of Kashmiri Pandits that has been the official policy of at least five different Union governments in these 18 years of their forced exile.

Kashmir is not okay, Mr Sayeed

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has recently set up an inter-ministerial group to prepare a report on the welfare of the Kashmiri Pandits. But that is small consolation for the thousands of hapless men, women and children who are convinced that nothing ever will be done to restore their lost lives.

Chief Minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed has on and off talked about enabling the Kashmiri Pandits to return to the valley. Three residential colonies are being set up for those willing to return. But Kashmiri Pandits believe this is an elaborate and devious political ploy meant to fool the Union government. Bearing in mind the Mufti’s track record, they have a point.

Interview: Panun Kashmir leader Kamal Hak

In any event, it makes little sense for the Kashmiri Pandits to live in ghettos: they will be sitting ducks during a terrorist strike. Moreover, the self-appointed spokesmen of the ‘Muslim only’ Kashmir valley have shown little interest in the return of the Kashmiri Pandits. Pro-Pakistani secessionists like Syed Ali Shah Geelani have openly opposed any talk of the Kashmiri Pandits returning to their own land.

‘Where do we return to?’ is a common refrain among the exiles. Their homes, which they had left behind, have been forcibly occupied. The ownership of their agricultural land has been surreptitiously transferred. Their shops and businesses have been either destroyed or illegally taken over. Government measures meant to protect Kashmiri Pandit property have been followed more in the breach than in practice. Politicians and officials have been complicit partners in this robbery.

In the months after the exodus of 1990, most Kashmiri Pandits were hopeful that they would soon be able to return to their homes with full dignity and honour. The months stretched into years. The years have stretched into a decade-and-a-half of exile whose end is nowhere in sight.

Today, they live on dole and in despair, not on hope.

Courtsy:Kanchan Gupta

A UNIQUE EXHIBITION ON TERRORISM UNLEASHED

In kashmir on October 19, 2008 at 05:42

François Gautier

Source: Kashmir herald

 

Do you know the FACTS about Kashmir?

Over 400,000 Kashmiri Pandits, constituting 99% of the total population of Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley, have been forcibly pushed out of the Valley by terrorists. Since 1989, they have been forced to live the life of exiles in their own country. Terrorism has unleashed in Kashmir a systematic campaign of terror, murder, loot, arson and rape against Hindus in Kashmir. About 70,000 of them still languish in makeshift refugee camps in Jammu and Delhi. Scores of temples in Kashmir have been desecrated, destroyed, looted. More than 900 educational institutions have been attacked by terrorists. Properties of Pandits have been vandalized, businesses destroyed or taken over, even hospitals have not been spared.

Did you know that this huge human tragedy is taking place in Free India?

Kashmir was known as “Sharda Peeth” , the abode of learning. Now the Pandits, the original inhabitants, have been forced to flee. 5000 years of civilization is at stake. THE ROLE OF PAKISTAN IN KASHMIRI TERROR is clear: Terrorism in Kashmir is an ideological struggle with specific fundamentalist and communal Agenda.

 

Terrorist violence aims at the disengagement of the state of Jammu and Kashmir from India and its annexation to Pakistan. It is a continuation of the Islamic fundamentalist struggle. The major dimension of terrorist violence in Kashmir is the terrorists’ commitment to the extermination and subjugation of the Hindus in the state, because Hindus do not subscribe to the idea of separation from India, nor will they allow governance by the tenets of Islam. Kashmiri Pandits have always been in the forefront of the struggle against secessionism, communalism and fundamentalism. Hence this peace loving minority with a progressive outlook became the main victim of terrorist violence.  The strategies involved in the terrorists’ operation against the Hindus in Kashmir are simple:

 

- The extermination of Hindus, i.e., subjecting Hindus to brutal torture, to instill fear among them in order to achieve their submission.

- To engineer a forced mass exodus of Hindus from the land of their ancestors by way of issuing threatening letters, kidnappings and torture deaths on non-compliance of the terrorists’ dictates and ensure the destruction of the secular and pluralistic character of Kashmiri Society.

- Attacks, molestations, kidnappings, gang rapes of the women folk of the Hindu Pandits to instill fear and humiliation.

- Destruction and burning of residential houses of the Hindus who have been compelled to abandon their homes.

- Looting of their properties and appropriation of their business establishments are undertaken to ensure that they do not return.

- Attachment of the ancestral and landed property of Pandits. Destruction of the social and religious institutions of the Hindus by the desecration and destruction of their places of worship.

- Appropriation of the property of the Hindu shrines.

BURNING BOOKS, LOOTING OF CULTURE is also a very important part of the plan. Kashmir was the crucible of Knowledge, Spirituality, a hallowed centre of learning and the cradle of Shivaism. Kashmiri Pandits excelled in philosophy, aesthetics, poetics, sculpture, architecture, mathematics, astronomy and astrology. Sanskrit was studied, propagated and spoken by women and men. Scholars and saints such as Kalhan, Jonraj, Srivar, Abhinavgupta, Somanand, Utpaldev, Somdev and Kshemendra created here an intellectual centre of unrivalled repute. Fundamentalism and terrorism have been ruthless in their assault on “Sharda Peeth”, zealous in ravaging its heritage, and consistent only in bloodthirsty intolerance. The destruction of Hindu places of worship, forced conversions of Pandits and death and ignominy to those who resisted, were accompanied by a savage assault on literary activity. This process has been going on since centuries.

Commencing 1998, the assault on learning began afresh. How else to erase 5000 years of civilization? The Jammaat-i-Islami, a fundamentalist organization, launched a campaign to ransack libraries in the educational institutions and flared ban on books which did not correspond to their ideas about man, world and God. The Kashmir university funded by the University Grants Commission and headed by the Governor of the state was denuded of two thousand books including the works of Milton, G.B. Shaw, Shakespeare, H.G. Wells and tomes on Hindu Philosophy. Book-shops were looted in broad daylight at Batamaloo, Srinagar. The library of the Information Centre run by Government of India was looted and set on fire.

As a correspondent covering India for more than 20 years, I have witnessed the terrible damage that terrorism in Kashmir has inflicted upon people’s lives, their family, their culture, the very fabric of society, not only of the Kashmiri Pandits, but also of the Muslims of the Valley, who after all, are the victims too of Pakistan’s bloody designs.

Hence, with two journalist friends, we started a Foundation: FACT – Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism. The first task of FACT has been to mount an exhibition on terrorism, focusing on the plight of the Kashmiri Pandits, so that the people of India who do not suffer directly from terrorism understand what it does to others.

We need your support and we invite all of you, whatever your class, caste, religion, or ethnic origin, to come and witness it. Come and see the FACTS. Later, we would like this exhibition to travel not only to all major India cities, but also to the United States, England, France and Switzerland, so that the world understands what India has been going through in the last fifty years. 

McCain’s jabs fall short of Obama

In kashmir on October 9, 2008 at 08:06

By Richard Wolffe
NEWSWEEK

In some ways, it wasn’t a fair contest.

John McCain was facing not one but two opponents. One was the Democratic nominee sitting on the bar stool across the red-carpeted stage from him. The other was his own veep nominee – who drew 70 million viewers to her debate against Joe Biden last week. Barack Obama (L) and John McCain at Nashville debate

For McCain to “win”, Obama would’ve had to slip on a banana peel during one of his ambles – whether rhetorical or actual. He didn’t come close.

 

Sarah Palin understood clearly the techniques that work on television. The substance is not what matters most; rather it’s the optics, and the angles, and the ability to project affability and warmth through the lens of the camera perched over the moderator’s shoulder.

That lesson was lost on John McCain in Nashville on Wednesday, who seemed to think that a town hall debate on television was the same as a town hall debate in a real town hall.

He paced up and down in fits and starts as he spoke. He leapt from subject to subject, soundbite to soundbite. Between answers, he sat down and scribbled page after page of notes, then jumped up and paced around silently.

Early on, he seemed ill at ease in engaging with his questioners; how close should he stand? And how much should he look at them? His approach seemed to present a serious challenge to the show’s producers, as they struggled to find the best way to frame McCain’s interactions.

There was no questioning the Republican nominee’s energy level; he seemed to have enough pent-up force to power a sub-station.

Pressure on McCain

Barack Obama, by contrast, barely touched his note pad, sat firmly in his seat when he wasn’t answering, picked a spot to stand in addressing his questioner and stuck to it.

He didn’t light the place up with his energy level, and critics will maintain that his cool demeanour still doesn’t connect with Main Street voters. But he moved easily about the stage, and seemed far more comfortable without a podium than his rival did.

Which is unusual, given McCain’s professed love of the town-hall setting. It was the McCain camp, after all, that had proposed a town-hall forum every week during early discussions about the debate schedule.

Despite McCain’s attacks, Obama seemed more at ease

Given the instant polls gauging the outcome Tuesday night, McCain ought to be grateful that Obama said no: a CNN poll showed a 24-point lead for Obama.

Heading into the showdown in Nashville, the pressure was largely on McCain.

Trailing in national polls and in a number of the key battleground states, he knew he needed to play up his national security credentials, raise questions about Obama’s experience-and try to reverse voters’ rising confidence in the Democratic Party’s ability to address their economic concerns.

He came out swinging, as he had done in the first debate. He bashed Obama on earmarks, and hit him again over his diplomatic posture vis-a-vis talks with Iran.

But at times, McCain seemed to sense that the audience might not be buying it – as though he was aware of the risks of attacking when many surveys suggest that the blows have driven his own negatives up.

Addressing a question that touched on the Bush administration’s energy legislation, he said: “By the way, my friends, I know you grow a little weary with this back and forth. It was an energy bill on the floor of the Senate loaded down with goodies, billions for the oil companies, and it was sponsored by Bush and Cheney. You know who voted for it? You might never know. That one,” McCain said, pointing to Obama.

“You know who voted against it? Me.” With that, he grinned like he’d just hit the jackpot on the slots.

Family values

Obama smiled through the attacks, but he was less generous with his praise than he’d been during their previous meeting in Mississippi.

Gone were the frequent nods to “John” being “right”, or absolutely right, on a whole host of issues.

At one point, he feinted in that direction, allowing that his opponent regarded him as “green behind the ears” (cliche police: that’s green, senator, or wet behind the ears).

But even as McCain called out a thank you, Obama wheeled and stuck in the shiv, reminding audiences that the supposedly mature one on stage had been the guy who once sang “Bomb Iran” to the tune of a Beach Boys ditty, and called for the “annihilation of North Korea.”

Obama also seemed determined to defuse another line of criticism – that he fails to connect with voters on a personal and emotional level.

He talked about how his mother had scrapped with insurance companies on her death bed, how the family had been on food stamps, and how his grandmother scrimped so that the family could afford to give him a first-class education.

And he sought to express empathy with his questioners as they described their own financial struggles. He hardly rivalled Bill Clinton’s ability to feel their pain- but he did express some of his own.

McCain remains a formidable presence – a tough debater relentlessly on the attack. But he needed a knockdown Tuesday night to help change the narrative of the campaign. At the end, Obama was still standing, and smiling.

On to Round Three.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.